Understanding Attested Written Wills in North Carolina

 

When it comes to planning for the future, especially in terms of what happens to our possessions after we pass away, having a will is crucial. In North Carolina, the law provides specific guidelines for creating a valid will. One type that is commonly used is known as an "attested written will." But what does that mean, and how do you ensure your will meets the legal requirements? Let's break it down into simpler terms, referencing the North Carolina General Statutes, specifically G.S. 31-3.3.

What is an Attested Written Will?

An "attested written will" sounds complex, but it's actually straightforward. In layman's terms, it's a will that you write down and then have witnessed by others according to the law. North Carolina's statutes lay out clear rules for how this process should happen to make sure your will is legally binding. This is important because it helps prevent any disputes over your will after you're gone.

The Legal Requirements

According to G.S. 31-3.3 of the North Carolina General Statutes, for a written will to be considered valid (or "attested"), it must comply with the following key requirements:

  • It must be in writing. This means the will needs to be physically written down, whether typed or handwritten.

  • The testator (the person making the will) must sign it. If the testator is unable to sign it themselves, they can have someone else do it for them in their presence and by their direction.

  • It must be witnessed. At least two competent witnesses must be present to observe the testator signing the will. These witnesses must also sign the will themselves, acknowledging that they witnessed the testator's signature or acknowledgment of the signature.

An Example in Layman's Terms

Let's say John Doe wants to make sure his assets are distributed according to his wishes after he passes away. He decides to create a will. John writes down how he wants his possessions to be divided among his family and friends. Once he's finished, he calls over two of his neighbors, Jane and Bob, to serve as witnesses. In front of Jane and Bob, John signs his will at the bottom. Then, Jane and Bob each sign the will as well, confirming they saw John sign it. Now, John's will is considered an attested written will under North Carolina law.

Why It Matters

Having your will properly attested is crucial because it ensures your wishes are legally recognized. This can prevent potential disputes among your loved ones and ensure your assets are distributed the way you want. It's about providing peace of mind for yourself and those you care about.

Final Thoughts

Creating a will might seem daunting, but understanding the basics, like what an attested written will involves, can make the process more approachable. If you're considering making a will, it might be a good idea to consult with a legal professional. They can help ensure your will meets all the necessary legal requirements and truly reflects your wishes.

Remember, planning ahead with a properly attested will is one of the most thoughtful things you can do for your loved ones. It's not just about the assets you're leaving behind; it's about leaving a legacy of care and consideration.


Get access to having your will drafted at no cost once you establish your legal membership. Click here for more information. 



        Be About Your Legal Services Logo (1).png

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two Judges from Mecklenburg Admit to Breaching Notary Regulations

Image
  On Friday, two judges from Mecklenburg County admitted to minor offenses related to notary public duties. District Court Judges Roderick Davis and Shanté Burke-Hayer faced these charges for actions that occurred prior to their election, specifically during a time in May 2022 when they shared office space, as stated by their attorneys in court. The North Carolina Department of the Secretary of State initiated an investigation following a complaint from one of Burke-Hayer's clients. Judge Davis acknowledged his guilt for performing an oath without the presence of the principal involved and for two instances of acknowledging documents without the principal. Similarly, Judge Burke-Hayer admitted to assisting in the administration of an oath and acknowledging documents without the principal's presence, totaling two counts for each action. Her lawyer, Harold Cogdell Jr., mentioned in a press release that Burke-Hayer was involved in the notarization of three documents without the si
Read more

Medical Care Decisions and Advance Directives: What You Should Know

Image
  **Introduction:** Medical care decisions and advance directives are essential tools for ensuring that an individual's healthcare preferences are respected and followed, even if they become unable to communicate or make decisions for themselves. This article provides an overview of the key aspects of medical care decisions and advance directives based on the document provided by the N.C. DHHS: Division of Medical Assistance. **What is an Advance Directive?** An advance directive is a set of directions given about the medical and mental health care one desires if they ever lose the ability to make decisions for themselves. In North Carolina, there are specific conditions under which an advance directive becomes effective: 1. If the individual becomes incurably sick with an irreversible condition that will result in death within a short period. 2. If the individual is unconscious and it's highly unlikely they will regain consciousness. 3. If the individual has advanced dementia
Read more

NC Lawsuit: Can Non-Lawyers Speak the Law? First Amendment Clash Over Legal Advice

Image
  A new lawsuit filed in federal court argues that the North Carolina’s prohibition on nonlawyers providing limited legal services violates the First Amendment. The suit, brought by the North Carolina Justice for All Project and the national Institute for Justice, contends that the state’s Unlawful Practice of Law (UPL) laws unconstitutionally restrict speech and deprive residents of opportunities for less expensive legal advice. The plaintiffs argue that the UPL laws are overly broad and sweeping, prohibiting nonlawyers from providing even basic legal services, such as helping clients with simple legal forms or representing them in uncontested divorces. They say that the laws stifle competition in the legal industry and make it more difficult for people to access affordable legal help. The plaintiffs point to other states that have successfully expanded access to legal services by allowing nonlawyers to provide limited legal services. For example, in California, nonlawyers can provide
Read more